Analysis of Anthropogenic Climate Change

Guys I must put my perpetuated wake up call series on hold momentarily(just a few days. Will actually have new episodes finished and uploaded before Easter) to address a topic that forms an integral part of the modern control apparatus. Global Warming is the gospel and to question the gospel is to be a heretic. I have heard this said before but I never would of imagined just how true this statement was until I expressed my opinions about Global Warming during by Conceptual Physics class today. PLEASE IF YOU VALUE YOUR LIBERTY. PLEASE IF YOU VALUE YOUR FREEDOMS. LISTEN TO MY WORDS AND WATCH THESE DOCUMENTARIES AND VIDEOS AND READ THE THOUSANDS OF PEER REVIEWED PAPERS. BTW THIS IS NOT A LEFT OR RIGHT ISSUE AND IM NOT A REPUBLICRAT OR DEMPUBLICAN! I CARE ONLY FOR OUR FREEDOM! ALSO, LET ME MAKE THIS CLEAR RIGHT NOW, I AM NOT DENYING CLIMATE CHANGE. CLIMATE CHANGE HAS EXISTED FOR 4.45 BILLION YEARS, BUT MAN ONLY ATTRIBUTES TO AN EXTREMELY SMALL PERCENTAGE OF THE CO2 RELEASED INTO THE ATMOSPHERE. IN FACT ACCORDING TO THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE ITSELF, THE BURNING OF FOSSIL FUELS ONLY CONSTITUTES AROUND 3% OF THE TOTAL CO2 RELEASED INTO THE ATMOSPHERE. 


 I am not a scientist, so everybody can just relax. These are concepts that we are exploring TOGETHER and there's not anything like a final word on any of this. You have the same resources and access to information that any scientist does. There is a BIG DIFFERENCE in formulating opinions based on science AND merely believing what the mainstream scientists tell you. These are the same scientists paid by toughs within the governments of the world seeking to perpetuate these inaccuracies for political and economic purposes. Very simply, C02 is a naturally occurring chemical which is necessary to accommodate all life on the planet. Its what plants breath and is only minimally related to temperature. Its actually a good thing. This is perhaps whats the most fantastic of all. Also don't forget, polar bears can swim 100s of miles and glaciers are continually expanding and contracting. Moons in our solar system that were once solid ice structures are now liquid seas AND MARS LOST 50% OF ALL ITS ICE STRUCTURES IN ONE YEAR!(obviously this is not resulting from our tail pipes and hair spray cans.) One more thing, the entire global population could comfortably fit within the land mass of Russia and the IPCC's predictions have proved greatly inaccurate.(For example the Florida Keys are exposed to entirely under water by now) Anyone can see that climate change is occurring BUT THE POINT IS, WHETHER OR NOT MAN IS CAUSING IT IS DEBATABLE. As this post will prove, there is anything but a complete consensus on this issue. And even if there was, consensus isn't a reason to discontinue research, analysis, or investigation into this or any issue for that matter. Scientists used to be rather beautifully described as “seekers after truth.” An ancient prominent Middle Eastern mathematician and scientist, whose image today graces an Iraqi banknote, once stated, “The seeker after truth does not put his trust in any old consensus: he questions it, and submits his learning from it to reason and demonstration.” T. H. Huxley stated, “The improver of natural knowledge absolutely refuses to acknowledge authority, as such. For him, skepticism is the highest of duties; blind faith the one unpardonable sin.” The scientific method is about checking. One does not accept a claim simply on the basis of popular acceptance. Truth is not discerned by majority vote. Science is not a belief system." We are subject to an ever-changing world that is more volatile than ever. The scientific opinions that we hold need to be reassessed daily. 


This video comes from my "2012 and the Transcendental Evolution of Man" lecture complied more than 2 years ago which illustrates how the changes we are experiencing on Earth are merely apart of a larger phenomenon. All scientists are cited and sourced so that the information can be easily verified. Most of this information comes straight from NASA. If you find this information interesting, please, watch the rest of the series which you can find else where on the blog:) (part 3 contains the most amazing info, but sadly it has received the fewest views :( )

NEXT, PLEASE WATCH THIS DOCUMENTARY WHICH EXPOSES THE FRAUDULENT SCIENCE SURROUNDING THE MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING HOAX!  

The biggest fraud of all perhaps is the overwhelming lie that there exists a complete consensus amongst mainstream scientists regarding the man made global warming issue. Its actually quite the contrary. More than 31,000 scientists including over 9,000 PhDs, feeling marginalized and without a voice, considered filing criminal charges of fraud against Al Gore in attempt to gain some media coverage regarding the truth about man made global warming. Here is a link to their website containing a summary of their peer reviewed research: http://www.petitionproject.org/index.php


And here's a clip of an early interview with the founder of the Weather Channel and weather forecaster, John Coleman detailing his contemplation of pursuing a lawsuit.

Its important to note that the title of the above video is inaccurate as the suit that was eventually filed came from Kent school governor Stewart Dimmock which deemed the film "An Inconvenient Truth" unfit to be shown at schools. Here a link detailing: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-486969/Judge-attacks-errors-Al-Gores-alarmist-climate-change-film.html


This may be something you have not heard of and information regarding this case is extremely difficult to find, but THE JUDGE ACTUALLY FOUND IN THEIR FAVOR RULING THAT 75 PAGES OF CORRECTIVE GUIDANCE BE PROVIDED TO EVERY SCHOOL IN ENGLAND SO THAT SCHOOL CHILDREN WOULD NOT BE EXPOSED TO THE UTTER NONSENSE CONTAINED IN "AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH." Here's a Washington post article confirming this fact.  :http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/11/AR2007101102134.html


Its important to point out that High Court Judge Michael Burton ruled that the film contains 9 errors. This was only because of court preceding time restraints. Only the 9 most pertinent errors were presented for this reason but as former policy ad visor to Margaret Thatcher, noble prize winner, inventor, peer reviewed academic etc. Lord Christopher Monckton asserts, the film contains an additional 35 inaccuracies and blatant lies. I HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS PRESENTATION BY LORD MONCKTON DETAILING THE OUTRIGHT FRAUD THAT IS "AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH.," AS WELL AS HOW THE IPCC, UN, AND OTHER GROUPS HAVE MISREPRESENTED DATA. GREAT BODY OF INFORMATION!!! PLEASE WATCH!!!(for toughs short on time, I recommend fast forwarding to around 18 minutes in as there is a lengthy introduction, but i recommend the intro as well as it looks at how the economic policy surrounding the issue effects the third world.)

Also to refute claims that Lord Monckton is not a peer reviewed author and hasn't been published in scientific journals, here is a link to his paper entitled "Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered," that was originally published in the July, 2008 journal "Physics and Society," which contains over 30 equations reviewed by  Alvin Saperstein Professor of Physics at Wayne State University as well as the review editor of the journal at the time and others. It shames me to say that the two editors of this journal were made to resign after the paper was published. Physics and Society "presents letters, commentary, book reviews, and non-peer-reviewed articles". Lord Monckton's paper was reviewed by editors which is not the same thing as going through a standard peer-review process like a scholarly journal. But I suggest you take Lord Mocktons advice and call Professor Saperstein at Wayne State and ask him personally if he reviewed the article as I did, for which he finally responded after many attempts with something to the effect of, "Ah geez, another one? Are you recording me?......Yes the article was reviewed by me but I cannot speak for the editors." I did not record him, but if I can get a hold of him so can you. Its actually of no consequence if it was peer reviewed or not. After all, how many peer reviewed papers has Al Gore and many other of the faces of Anthropogenic Global warming submitted? I simply called Saperstein in attempt to see if Monckton was a liar or not?


There are plenty of peer reviewed papers published refuting man made climate change and if you are caught up on not being able to consider anything unless it is endorsed by the controlled scientific establishment, I SUGGEST YOU TAKE YOUR PICK FORM THE 900+ PEER REVIEWED PAPERS that support skeptic arguments against Anthropogenic Climate Change or Anthropogenic Global Warming FOUND HERE: (this is the best collection I have found compiled together but there are more.)     http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html


You should check out this article entitled "New Peer-Reviewed Scientific Studies Chill Global Warming Fears" as well as it comes from the US SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS WEBSITE: http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=84e9e44a-802a-23ad-493a-b35d0842fed8

Also, our friend Andrew from populartechnology.net has brought these EXCELLENT REPORTS FROM THE NIPCC (Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change) to our attention:
Climate Change Reconsidered - 2009 Report (868 pgs) and  
Climate Change Reconsidered - 2011 Interim Report (430 pgs)
These reports reference at length the peer reviewed literature on the matter. CHECK THEM OUT HERE:
http://www.nipccreport.org/reports/reports.html 
 

Here is Moncktons paper too if your interested as well: 
 http://www.aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/200807/monckton.cfm


...And i could go on... But it important to note that the peer review process itself is extremely defective. What happens when the same individuals that hold the same views continually review each others work? Well....you get bias science. Perhaps this video will shed a bit of light on how the peer review process can be misleading.

 More over, if the science is so sound surrounding Anthropogenic Global Warming , why is Al Gore so afraid to debate Lord Christopher Monckton? Its not for lack of trying as Gore has been extended invitations literally dozens of times. Perhaps its because he might not collect his $300,000 speaking fee, but his primary stated reason that he wont engage in debate is because, "There is no more debate. The debate is closed." I think just from the small amount of information I have provided above, any intelligent individual with the capacity for honesty can see that IT IS NOT.(need I remind you of the 31,000+) In fact, even scientists close to Al Gore including John Christy AND OTHERS whom Gore shares his noble prize with are abandoning his scientifically defective sinking ship.


Read this OTHER REPORT FROM THE US SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS WEBSITE: http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=f80a6386-802a-23ad-40c8-3c63dc2d02cb
 
And watch this: 

While on the topic of Al Gore I think it is pertinent to also discuss perhaps why he might want to push this fraud to the American People and the world considering an argument regularly stated by Global Warming Alarmists is that the main motivation for skepticism is monetarily backed by Big Oil. I am definitely not supporting Big Oil and the need for alternative energy sources is obviously grave. However, its important you have both sides of the story. Gore should not be the one talking about greedy oil corporations. As it turns out, the Gore family “owns at least a quarter of a million dollars’ worth of Occidental stock.” Back in the 1990s, when Gore was in the White House, Colombia’s U’wa tribe had a bone to pick with Occidental. In 2000, Ken Silverstein wrote for "The Nation":

"One of the world’s hottest battles between indigenous groups and multinational oil companies is heating up in Colombia, where Occidental Petroleum is seeking to drill on land claimed by the 5,000-member U’wa tribe. Early this year, the Colombian government deployed several hundred soldiers to guard workers building a road to the multibillion-dollar project. That led to a clash in February when security forces used tear gas to break up an anti-Occidental demonstration of several hundred Indians. Three children reportedly drowned when they fell into a river as they fled from government troops."   

Read the full article entitled "Gores Oil Money" HERE:  http://www.thenation.com/article/gores-oil-money

I think it is also important to note that the Criminal CEO Ken Lay of Enron and Others were very instrumental in formulating the "Cap and Slave.....uh I mean Trade" system. In this Aaron Dykes special report he explains a bit of the history of the carbon tax hitting on Ken Lay and Enron's involvement. If nothing else listen to part 2. Its only three minutes long and includes an actual voice recording of Enron employees calling California power plants to tell them to "force power outages!"

This leads us to another good point. Water and power rates are up 20% in my Newton, North Carolina household. Else where in the nation there have been upwards of 50% increases over the last year. This is the arrogant elitist mind set of our alarmist politicians: "Increase the energy rates, so the public will try to conserve more and use less." The average American fails to see the parallels between Climate legislation and the cost at the pump or in the home. To better understand the connections read the Wall Street Journal article entitled, "THE CAP AND TRADE FICTION." http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124588837560750781.html

And this New York Times article entitled, "House Bill Will Spur 20% Electricity-Price Hike by 2030"

http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/08/04/04greenwire-house-bill-will-spur-20-electricity-price-hike-28686.html 

Obviously their are major errors in their cost "projections." I think it would be more appropriate to say "OUT RIGHT LIES" instead of "major errors," because as I have already stated my house hold energy rates have increased about 20%. I live in NC and if you need documentation here's the Hickory Daily record article stating Duke Powers average house hold electricity hikes are 17% and details there attempt to justify doing so. http://www2.hickoryrecord.com/news/2011/oct/08/5/duke-energy-proposing-significant-rate-hike-ar-1472208/

As basic economic models detailing supply and demand relate, if demand of a product increases or stays the same and the supply then decreases...the PRICE INCREASES. Perhaps this explains why our current administration recently shut down over 50 power plants across the nation in Enron'sque forced outages.

So while middle class Americans are struggling to keep the lights on, how are toughs implementing these policies faring? For toughs that don't know, Gore teamed up with former Goldman Sacs Ceo David Blood in 2004 to found Generation Investment Management LLP. (or Blood and Gore as they are referred to on the inside) As as most anyone can tell you, when Goldman Sacs is involved??? Need I say more? Here is a link to infowars which picked up on a Times article that year which detailed Gores projected "BILLION DOLLAR CARBON PROFITS."http://www.infowars.com/al-gore-set-to-become-first-carbon-billionaire/

Its a coincidence I'M SURE that I could not find out any information on recent earnings for this firm though I have heard Gore state that all money made from Carbon is funneled into a nonprofit.....LOL....as if there is such a thing. If anyone can refer me to the firms 2011 or first quarter 2012 earnings, I would appreciate it. When looking however I ran across this great site that tracks nearly all of the activity of the most prominent "Green" organizations and notes that one of Blood and Gores main partners, The Alliance for Climate Protection collected a cold hard $88,303,373 in 2008. Apparently you can also look up most leftist organizations on this site as well. I don't really get caught up in the whole left-right false paradigm, but I feel that this is a valuable site none the less. There's also some good links. I recommend Muckety. It is a site that effectively maps organizations and individuals connections and influence based on a strict rating system.  

 http://www.undueinfluence.com/alliance_for_climate_protection.htm

 I also want to upload some info wars videos in order to provide a better look at Gore as I was going to post many of the clips that they have already consolidated in these three parts of their documentary "Fall of the Republic," that do a good job detailing Gores corrupt political and financial career. Don't forget, Gore is who sold us NAFTA and GAT, is an oil baron, owned mining companies that polluted in excess, and was the CEO for Apple, probably the lest green company in Silicon Valley. These documentary excerpts document this and MUCH MORE REGARDING THE SCIENCE, POLITICS, AND AGENDA OF THIS ISSUE. A MUST WATCH!!! EXTREMELY IMPORTANT!!! If you want to gain a good understanding of whats occurring today in America watch the full documentary on Youtube. 

 

And of coarse we now come to the grand daddy of them all CLIMATEGATE! In case you were under a rock somewhere in November 2009, Climategate refers to the hacking of a server at the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA). Several weeks before the Copenhagen Summit on climate change, an unknown individual or group had breached CRU's server and thousands of emails and computer files were copied to various locations on the Internet. Here are some if you would like to check them out. Many more are out there. Search them out HERE.http://foia2011.org/

Here a little commentary on the matter by Alex Jones:  (right after it happened)

And a longer more lengthy and detailed analysis a month or so after:

It seems the political agenda promoting Anthropogenic Climate Change is leading somewhere....is all being pushed for some ultimate agenda. We should ask ourselves where? And YOU might want to ask yourself what AGENDA 21 IS???  VISIT THE UN WEBSITE FOR THE COMPLETE AGENDA 21 MANUAL. YES FOLKS ITS REAL! The only reason I haven't linked to it is so they won't be able to link back to me. PLEASE MAKE TIME TO WATCH EVERYTHING BELOW!!!!!!!!!!!!

EXTREMELY IMPORTANT! WATCH THIS ONE AND THE ONE ABOVE IF NOTHING ELSE.

There is much more information out there regarding Agenda 21. Please do your own research. But as you have seen from the plethora of information above, its safe to say that there is much more to the issue of Climate Change than meets the eye. Please be honest with yourselves......God Bless!!!!!


UPDATE! QUESTIONING MAN MADE CLIMATE CHANGE NOW MENTAL DISORDER AND SUBJECT TO ARREST! (DOESN'T THIS SOUND FAMILIAR.....PLEASE READ AND WATCH THE FOLLOWING!!! (AND YES THE VIDEOS ARE ACTUALLY REAL AD CAMPAIGNS FROM THE GREEN PARTY AND UN)


http://www.infowars.com/climate-change-skepticism-a-sickness-that-must-be-treated-says-professor/
 http://www.infowars.com/green-fascism-the-growing-threat-of-eco-tyranny/
http://www.infowars.com/club-of-rome-behind-eco-fascist-purge-to-criminalize-climate-skepticism/ 

YOUTUBE NOW DELETING AND BANNING VIDEOS CRITICAL OF MAN MADE CLIMATE CHANGE.

PLEASE WHAT EVER YOUR STANCE ON THE ISSUE.....STAND UP FOR OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF FREE SPEECH AND EXPRESSION. I CANT BE THE ONLY ONE TO SEE THIS AS THE FASCIST MADNESS WRAPPED UP IN A GREEN BOW THAT IT IS.... ORGANIZE AND DEFEND YOUR LIBERTIES!!!(Student Coalition for the Pursuit of Truth advocates a strict stance of nonviolence.)  


 UPDATE 04/11/2012: 50 Top Astronauts, Scientists Sign Letter Slamming NASA For Promoting Man-Made Climate Change Dogma.
http://www.infowars.com/50-top-astronauts-scientists-engineers-sign-letter-claiming-extremist-giss-is-turning-nasa-into-a-laughing-stock/ 

UPDATE 04/13/2012:  GREAT REPORT BY Darrin McBreen DETAILING WHAT EFFECT THE UN AGENDA 21 POLICIES ARE HAVING 

POLAR BEAR GATE.... 

UPDATE 04/24/2012: Head climate alarmist scientists jump ship

   
Greens launch spy satellite to track methane emissions. 

UPDATE 05/24/2012: Carbon tax hits Australia! Protestors and individuals who speak out against are subject to million dollar heresy fines!

UPDATE 06/08/2012: Florida mandates draconian recycling legislation. Fines for not complying.  

 UPDATE:  08/03/2012:  Agenda 21 Cutting off Electricity to U.S. Cities! 

UPDATE 09/23/2012: UN Agenda 21 Stealth Takeover:
 

Professor wants to cut population by 50% by implementing sterilizing drugs covertly 

Here's a bit of commentary on the issues from yours truly 

(Sorry mixed up H. W. Bush and Clinton. Was actually Bush that agreed to the earth summit in Rio, then Clinton reinforced it during the next administration. :0 This is obvious as Clinton was president after Bush....lol....brain flatulence....)